URGENT DEMAND FOR PUBLIC INQUIRY NHS & POLICE, AND RESTRAINING ORDERS AGAINST BOTH
“We were very concerned by what we heard about the safeguards. The evidence suggests that tens of thousands of people are being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law, and without the protection that Parliament intended. Worse still, in some cases the safeguards are being wilfully used to oppress individuals and to force decisions upon them. The Government needs to go back to the drawing board to draft replacement provisions that are easy to understand and implement, and in keeping with the style and ethos of the Mental Capacity Act.”
Lord Hardie, House of Lords Mental Capacity Act Committee report
As many of you are already aware, Carol Woods has been gang stalked by Lancashire Police, Greater Manchester Police, and Harrow, working either officially or unofficially to silence her and to obtain the documentary evidence that she has about serious organised crime, fraud, contempt of court, corporate manslaughter, fraud on the court, and various other crimes for which Chief Constables in Lancashire, Greater Manchester and London, and the CEO of the NHS have, at the very least, vicarious liability. It is suspected that their involvement may be deeper than that. The public is demanding protection for Carol Woods effective immediately, and an investigation into the crimes committed against her by police, NHS employees, and others, known and unknown, from Lancashire and beyond.
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH CAROL WOODS’ MENTAL HEALTH.
HER SECTIONING AND UNLAWFUL DETENTON SINCE NOVEMBER 2015 WAS FRAUDULENT AND A CONSPIRACY.
The following approx. two hour recording gives an overview of her unlawful detention in mental health facilities and the conspiracy involved. Many of the culprits are named and identified. At one point, Carol has to leave the telephone. PLEASE BE PATIENT AS THE RECORDING HEREBY PRESENTED CONTINUES AFTER SEVERAL MINUTES.
You will find interesting details in the recording about Cherie Blair.
Dr. Kurt Buhagiar from Orchard mental health facility in Lancaster was contacted by Sgt. Philip Spencer #638, or someone purporting to be him, by telephone. He advised Dr. Buhagiar that, as soon as he discharges Carol Woods from Orchard, he is going to have her picked up again, sectioned under mental health legislation, and committed to another mental health institution.
We are demanding her immediate protection from these thugs.
She authorises me to make complaints on her behalf and to demand an inquiry into her case, below.
I await your responses.
From: “Data Analysis” <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 10:52:18 AM Subject: Permission given to you from me.
To whom it concerns: this is to give written permission for Ms Jean James to access what is necessary in order to assist me in my case.
Carol Woods Ms
my house stolen, wrecked and looted 27 Oct 08 and 19 Nov 08.
Dear Jean James this is formal so you can forward it on: today about 12 noon Dr Buhagiar told me he had done a deal with the police and they would not arrest me after all. BUT I pointed out that I do not do “deals” and was quite happy to see what “evidence” they had against me. The police want to “draw a line under “events (of serious harassment of me ) if I draw a line under events of harassment of me they will draw a line under events of claiming I harass others. The police have not sent me the custody record of 7 Nov 2016 nor have they sent the copy my solicitor asked for. Dr Buhagiar told me he had at last a diagnosis of “delusion” and when I pointed out that his last “diagnosis” was on 13 Jan 2016 that I had a brain tumour; he cannot explain how his dangerous drugs (he denies they are dangerous) help with a brain tumour. I told him I would not take them after weaning myself off. He threatened with another arrest and Sectioning. I pointed out that they would have to do it all again to get right what they have had so horribly wrong this time AGAIN. The police of course did not like my solicitor asking for custody records nor did they like my formal report of 2 council staff DAVID WATAMOUGH and a new staff member HELENE (both with ID) with NHS JO ATKINSON (no ID) and the old woman they claimed was Dr LINDA ASHWORTH harassing me on 21 Oct 2014 at 28 Fell View with the consequential documents produced supposedly from Ashworth when on 15 Feb 2016 it was admitted that ASHWORTH “psychiatrist” had never called to 28 Fell View. This does not make me feel safe. This climb down is what happened to PAULINE CAMPBELL campaigner for women’s situations in prisons to be improved after her daughter committed suicide on her first night when she was imprisoned. The day after the climb down on her 8th arrest, Pauline was found dead. She had emailed me after she had her case squashed (IAN RUSHTON was the CPS think of my naming him in the MIKE TODD matter) and was jubilant: she was not depressed. How did Dr KURT BUHAGIAR respond when I quoted from Dr KUMAR’s report? Dr Kumar has 19 years experience, Buhagiar has 1 year or thereabouts? Buhagiar said Dr Kumar was PAID to record what he recorded about me. I told him I was shocked at his gross unprofessionalism. I am now on my way to 28 Fell View and use this Internet shop in Lancaster. Carol Woods Ms. Please can this to ANDY et al. many thanks, this is YOUR intervention I am sure. I can now send emails regularly.
Apologies for rushed presentation: all I can manage living like Anne Frank. Watergate in England: fulfils all criteria: conspiracy, murder, use of public monies for private purposes, political burglary etc, My house as referred to is CHERRY TREES SUNNYSIDE LANE LANCASTER LA1 5ED. I have not sold it, there was no mortgage to take possession of, I have not been bankrupt, I am not dead, I am not anyone but myself, I have not abandoned it, all are stories put out to explain my predicament. In 2006 The Investigatory Powers Tribunal was told by Lancashire police that I was not Carol Woods but someone else. The investigation then ceased. Since then they have told others that I have been at least 6 different people. The person invented ,most recently is a Mrs Carole Woods to muddy the waters of investigation.
“Carol Woods is secretly, illegally detained in Orchard mental health institution, Lancashire, denied phone calls and visitors, secretly moved following CQC investigation at Cygnet, possibly sectioned under the mental health act.
Millions of Supporters of Carol Woods Safety Group”
“———- Forwarded message ———-Date: 5 February 2016 at 14:46
Subject: Fw: Police corruption Lancs. Use dead people.
Dear Sirs, I have recently been sent an email by persons who were under the impression my case was about me and my mother. That was in innocence so I told them, my mother has been dead over 20 years, dying young. The use of my dead mother has its motive so I record the why and wherefore here for all agencies and each time the Lancashire Gestapo use my dead mother again I will send this out.
Some detail they try to use to confuse my mother. In 2006 The Investigatory Powers Tribunal started to investigate my case but ended the inquiry in a short space of time.
It was March 2008 before I found out they had been told I did not exist and was really my older sister.
The IPT did not challenge me but believed it. To help that FRAUD to see to be FACT the Gestapo accessed MY E-ON records and added an 0161 number as contact to be proof I was my sister and not me in Lancaster. BUT my sister has never had an 0161 number, she is Greater Manchester but not the 0161 area. That was so easy to check but no one thought of checking. (See recent E-On scandal- in my experience they are corrupt.) In May 2008, the Gestapo found out that I knew of their fraud to the IPT but I had disappeared from all records. I had not for example been able to vote in 2007 and told I could not use the library as I was not a resident etc, I did not know I had disappeared from all records. In May 08 they recorded formally that I was my daughter, “She is her daughter” they recorded.
In April 2006 (19th) a psycho cop JANET WOODALL had posed as me in the EAT, (one case Mike Todd was murdered for investigating later) and the president was Michael Burton. Mr Burton was one of the IPT, the Gestapo had to stop the enquiry because he was about to discover the deception and impersonation of me in HIS court. (I had had my appeal stayed because of major witness intimidation; I had it stayed by Jeanne Spinks the Chief Excecutive, the police did nothing about the serious intimidation as they organised it. Thus I knew nothing about it going ahead until later. One from the Home Office told me. SIMON WATKINS. He found a ref on the Internet. Woodall had been helped by staff in the EAT MICHAEL ARBUCKLE, PAULINE DONLEAVY and JULIA JOHNSON. They all knew she was not me and that I had not prepared the appeal papers. That was another reason I had to be non-existent. Woodall looks nothing like me.
In late 2011, I went to Ashton cemetery (not far from where my sister lives) to see my mother’s spot, the staff could not locate the spot where her ashes had been placed as her records had “disappeared”. I went to the main Oldham registry and all records had “disappeared”. My mother was apparently not dead. The Gestapo pretended that my sister, who had cared for our mother, was caring for me and I was my dead mother. I was staying at my sister’s at the time. I then bought my car which spoiled such a lot. X165 YUB and my sister has never driven, the daughter they claimed I was has never driven. I was really me. Our mother never drove. I have had my licence many years and have a full no claims bonus. Obviously for my social work post I was an essential car user BUT the Gestapo trying to make me someone the opposite of me had one of theirs and follow on sleazy “health” staff claim I was mentally ill, totally deluded in saying I had had the jobs I said I had had. Thus I had not worked for LCC and had not blown the whistle and thus was not me. They used that AGAIN on 7 Nov 2015 and stuck to it until I retrieved my work files and showed them to those who had recorded that and illegally detained me as being mentally ill. They did not apologise and say “Sorry, mistaken ID” they changed the delusion! They decided I was deluded in saying high profile persons knew of my case. I showed a letter to me “Dear Carol” from HRH Prince Charles and Baroness Young of Old Scone, MP’s etc which I happened to have among the files I retrieved. I thought they were quite high profile. They just changed the delusion and even hinted that I only claimed to have my children! That goes on, they just make it up and they clearly are insane in being able to think of what they think of. The main lunatic is IAN YOUNG Gestapo legal rep.
Leaving my sister’s Jan 2012 I returned to MY home area to regain my house. I rented a caravan at 298 Oxcliffe Rd Morecambe LA3 3EJ where the landlady Mrs Margaret Middleton was about the same age my mother would be had she not died. Mrs Middleton became me as my dead mother claiming DWP monies saying she was “ill” and needed carers. The Gestapo I took photos of aiding her. She took part in telephone interviews e.g. Sept 2012 as if it was me. I had no phone at all and landlines cannot be installed in caravans. That reported events at 298 included the attempts to murder me and more DWP fraud was uncovered. I left there 1 July 2013 and rented a council flat, 3 Penhale Gardens LA3 2QA. It was sheltered accommodation which I did not want or need but there they had someone else be me as my dead mother. BUT in that they also had a roughneck pose as daughter of the old fraudster to be me and my mother with a looter of the dead living in flat 5 posing as sister to the “daughter” thus they were to be my sister and me and our mother.
In flat 3 I found out that the roughneck RYCROFT flat 4 had been one to bully to death the former tenant of flat 3 a Mrs Margaret Porter. Mrs Porter’s assets were looted, no court was appointed to oversee her “estate”. RYCROFT tried to sell MY house Aug 2013 posing as me “too disabled” to live in my house. (I can prove all this incidentally.) Mrs Porter’s murder was covered up; I found out she had not been the first victim of such. Her car YK02 VPF was stolen by the troll in flat 5 who posed as “sister”. She then given a provisional licence IN MY NAME to pose as me as an “L” driver – making me? I was to become Mrs Carole Woods BUT the Gestapo and council then pretended I was Mrs Porter’s daughter who had inherited the flat on her death. Rycroft kept the bank card and kept spending Mrs Porter’s money as if Rycroft was me as if I was daughter of Mrs Porter thus ENTITLED to spend the Halifax money. FRAUD. The car used for Rycroft was Y96 OBU. She did not drive so the council drove her about as if she was me. There is a great deal to that but I left the flat March 2014 and move to 28 Fell View Caton LA2 9RP and find EXACTLY the same. the RYCROFT replacement is a malicious old troll in 30 JUNE WILLIAMS, but who was my “mother” in the flats? A malicious old troll SYBIL WESTWELL flat 2 who the police took out at least 3 times and away for a holiday “Look, she’s not dead”. They always used unmarked car N10 KWW; I have it all on photos and much else. Westwell was to be “replaced” by similar in 32 Fell View MARY LAMB and another car bought in fraud PF08 WDJ a black Mitubishi. Lamb and Williams went out as mother and daughter a few times when Williams was posing as me. Williams has ID IN MY NAME provided by the Gestapo. Who was the old lady who suffered as Mrs Porter? It was a Mrs Olive Greenbank, bullied out and to death ultimately so I could have 28 Fell View. The document showing why 28 was wanted for me went out months ago.
My maiden name is GREENWOOD I kept my married name after my divorce. It is WOODS not WOOD. I am not Mrs, I am not CAROLE and have never pretended to be. But as Greenwood the Gestapo tried to make me Mrs Greenbank’s daughter thus another, “She is her daughter”. Leaving my sister or my daughter then to be me. (I have other daughters as well as that one and I haven’t made them up either.) Westwell, Rycroft, troll flat 5, Mrs Middleton, Williams, Lamb have no daughters and children, except Mrs Middleton who has a son and he for a while was MR CAROL WOODS with the Gestapo giving him work for Bibby’s of Ingleton in that name to invent a MR CAROL WOODS. That non-existent person is another reason Mike Todd GMP was murdered. Thus MY mother is dead. What sick minded person thought of resurrecting her and making her me to then have old parasites pretend to be my mother?
Our mother worked all her life, all her relatively short life. These are long term parasites and they are all part of what I was taking to London on photos with related document. I am Carol Woods illegally detained.”
Carol Woods, CHERRY TREES, SUNNYSIDE LANE, LANCASTER, postcode LA1 5ED
whistleblower against crimes by Police stealing children, ex-Child Protection Officer, ex-Level 3 Social Worker is missing after exposing crimes by public servants in Lancaster!
Lancashire County Council is under the control of Outside Forces, responsible for covering up serious crimes against babies and children of child kidnap and child trafficking,and ex government members secrets, in conspiracy with Police.
Here is the witness testimony which proves this:
As a public servant, it is your personal duty to serve and protect the public, particularly whistleblowers, otherwise you are complicit in the serious crimes it is your duty to following the principles of public life.
Please let the supporters of Carol Woods Safety Group know she is safe and well! And her release will be forthwith.
She has been terrorised by members of people in public office in Lancaster. Anyone involved in these crimes is hereby removed from public office!
DAY, 25 SEPTEMBER 2007
Carol Woods exposing employment tribunal corruption Manchester Employment Tribunals and Lancashire County Council Exposure of corruption.
This is the third time this entry has been entered, the accessing and removal of this entry suggests that the matters are to be kept uncovered.
They are not:
They are to be uncovered.
When injustice becomes law – resistance becomes duty.
This entry is second in the series and is the longest entry.
Follow on entry from the corruption exposed within the Local Government Ombudsman’s York office. Linkhttp://www.criticalreader2006.blogspot.com
Lancashire County Council (LCC) were leaders in that corruption, courts compounded the corruption beginning with Manchester Employment Tribunals (MET).
This entry has been added twice before; ‘they’ keep removing it and replacing the sites with advertising.
No matter, the imagination for naming blogs knows no limit: the earlier ones being
http://www.criticalreader2007.blogspot.com/ and http://www.criticalreader07.blogspot.com/
It needs to be recorded that Lancashire Social Services were on ‘Special Measures’ throughout 2001 and had been for years and continued to be for even more. They were quite useless.
The corruption shown by ROGER BARHAM at least in York LGO office began the process.
The tribunal (MET) where I applied for a claim of Constructive Dismissal against (LCC) recorded my claim as being 2406569/01 and was initiated on 28 August 2001.
The IT1 recorded breaches of employment contract such as ‘no supervision as a child protection social worker’ denied access to the Equal Opportunities policies, denied access to the Grievance Procedures, and criminal acts perpetrated by my employer, Lancashire Social Services.
I had blown the whistle finally on LCC in 2001 re Fylde Community School and my claim in MET included the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.
Within all that I had been expelled by my then union, UNISON contrary to the Trades Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. UNISON are well known to have freemasonry-style relationships with management in public employers and are well known the abandon members when it suits them. In my case I had a Trevor McLoughlin, or had not depending on how one views it.
I heard nothing from MET for months. The Employment Tribunal Service (ETS) was devised for litigants in person, there was no perceived need for a solicitor.
By Christmas 2001, on receipt of the LGO letter (see link) I received a letter from LCC, BEVERLEY CULLEN saying that LCC would not inform me who their witnesses were to be.
IAN FISHER identified himself as Head of Legal Services.
MET continued to ignore the case.
On 17 Sept 01 I had received a letter from DAVID FAIRCLOUGH Head of Human Resources Social Services saying he would have my case held in abeyance and I had written to MET saying I would not agree to the holding of my case in abeyance. However, the indications were that it had been held in abeyance firstly against my knowledge and then against my express wishes.
Meanwhile I applied to the High Court for a Judicial Review of the LGO’s ‘findings’ re Fylde.
I made an affidavit to swear in Lancaster Magistrates Court as is my right in March 2002 but the Head of Legal Services, JOHN ROBINSON refused to allow me access for no reason. A local solicitor assisted me, the case went forward and I was invited by Judge Hooper to apply for a date for an oral hearing.
July 2002 approached and I was summonsed to MET for a hearing without proper notice time. I did not know then I was entitled to proper notice of time and attended.
The Chairman was ANNA WOOLLEY. LCC was represented by B CULLEN and a VICTOR WELCH, I went alone.
A Woolley found I had a strong case and set the substantive hearing for 10 days in March 03, 17-28 incl
I requested an earlier hearing.
I was told that there was shortage of chairmen. Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, statute law, affords me rights to speedy hearings and shortage of staff is not accepted as a reason for delaying proceedings. The HRA and Article 6 was ignored by MET.
Ms Woolley instructed me to compile a statement of 48 pages, paginate the documents and release all to LCC within 14 days.
I objected to that, as a litigant in person I was trying to work (albeit part time because of illness caused by LCC) to mitigate losses, deal with this on my own and the High Court Judicial Review.
(I had gained employment as a lecturer and researcher after leaving social services) LCC and A Woolley told me that I could not have 2 court cases running at the same time and thus I would have to drop one case. I believed a chairman of MET and agreed to drop the Judicial Review for the claim in MET.
I complained that LCC would use my statement and documents to manufacture their own case against me. A Woolley pointedly told Cullen and Welch that there would be sanctions for perjury.
She herself was to hear the case, I was also then granted 3 weeks to deliver up my statement and documents.
I requested the release of certain clients’ files to me, SP, SP, BM, KM, MB, LF. I was denied the file of MB but was to see the others when I delivered my statement and related documents.
LCC were given 9 weeks to send me their witness statements and documents.
I wrote to Judge Hooper explaining why I was withdrawing my application re Fylde. He did not reply.
I delivered my statement and documents to LCC legal dept. in July 2002 and told Cullen that LCC had destroyed my GP notes of 2001. I had only copied the first and the last in that series.
After handing over my statement (reduced to 43 pages) and documents I was allowed to see the files but not allowed to make notes. I could ask for photocopies of pages.
The files of SP and SP were not the files and were nothing to do with me. As a member of the public, which I was at that time, I should not have been allowed to see those files. The breach of confidentiality for the clients in question was appalling, I made that clear.
The files of BM and KM had been altered and were incomplete.
The file of LF had been seriously altered.
All the alterations were to the detriment of the clients in attempts to discredit my work as a social worker.
I complained to the Corporate Information Security Manager, FRANK LOUGHLIN, to the legal dept. to the Director of Social Services at that time, PAULINE OLIVER, Social Services Inspectorate, MET, the LGO, nobody commented except MET who ordered LCC to deliver up the true files of SP and SP.
I eventually inspected those files and they too had been altered to the detriment of the clients.
All the children involved were very young.
I informed all as above again and the Information Commissioner (ICO) via JIM PRESSLY and remained ignored.
LCC were dismayed at my statement and documents, all events were outlined as facts with evidence to support the facts such as being denied the grievance procedure, denied training, denied applications for other jobs, forced to work with known bullies, TONY BRADSHAW, PATRICIA ALLEN, GILLIAN ARMSTRONG, in GREENBANK STREET OFFICE PRESTON., no supervision, being asked to alter files and perjury myself in High Court Family Division, Blackburn (LF case). Illegally convened Case Conferences to try and discredit my work, covert monitoring of me, informing colleagues that they were not to associate with me, offer me harassment, threats, intimidation, forcing me to apply for my own job whilst off sick with stress, forcing me to interview whilst off sick with that illness and dismissing me in that period. I was dismissed on 10 August 2001 by ARMSTRONG over the telephone and she told me not go in anymore.
I did. I asked my GP to sign me as fit to work and returned to Greenbank Street.
They were not pleased to see me. MY desk had been cleared, my files had gone and I was locked out of the ISSIS recording system. They were preventing me from doing my job.
I informed all that Armstrong had no contractual right to dismiss me, had offered me no feedback after her ludicrous ‘interview’ of 10 Aug 01, any one of the abuses I suffered at the hands of those inept, stupid people would have won me a tribunal claim.
I was confident in my claim. Under Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 I made a Subject Access Request and received my personnel file papers from LCC. LCC had had 40 days to comply under the Act but made me wait for 84 days knowing they would enjoy collusion with the corrupt in the ICO. I informed Pressly in the ICO: the law was not applicable to the LCC.
Knowing that LCC had filled my personnel file with manufactured ‘reports’ ‘meetings’ etc all which discredited me and were for use in the tribunal I could show that they were all false in content.I would be declaring perjury under the terms of the Perjury Act 1911 case law R v Sharpe/Stringer 1937.
But on 28 August 2001 I wasn’t even at the beginning of the learning curve and resigned.
I had been constructively dismissed as well as being unfairly dismissed.
B Cullen wrote to me in August 2001 saying that she would need to revise all their statements after seeing mine.
I had been forced to sign a form on each occasion I visited the legal department to see the files. Immediately after returning home I wrote saying the form had been signed under duress. My signature therefore counted for nothing.
LCC did not comply with the Order to deliver up their statements and documents and I was forced to complain again about their behaviour. Their statements came in dribs and drabs. Ms Woolley ordered LCC to send a copy to the court, she already had mine. LCC had sent it to her hoping to discredit me with it. The opposite happened. Ms Woolley ordered Sue Mitchell and Pauline Oliver then Director to appear with the rest.
Pauline Oliver took ‘early retirement’ in October 2002.
November 2002 and MET forced me to another directions hearing at the request of LCC.
There was no need for this, all documents had been exchanged by then but LCC then had a barrister best known for her yobbish, screeching, no points of law behaviour: TANYA VERONICA GRIFFITHS.
In Nov. 02 friends of mine expressed an interest and accompanied me. Now a DAVID LEAHY was Chairman and he clearly knew Griffiths and LCC also, they had definitely met to discuss my case prior to my being call in.
Before I sat down Leahy was aggressively shouting, “We have to consider the Local Authority”.
Leahy said he would not ask LCC for the witnesses from senior management completely overriding Ms Woolley’s order. He denied me witnesses saying, “I’m not having a queue of people tell me how wonderful you are”.
He said, “They’ve had to get a barrister. Have you any idea what Ms Griffiths earns in a day?”
(She wasn’t worth it being as lazy, ignorant of the law, unintelligent and poorly qualified like the rest of the deranged in LCC legal dept baying for vengeance.)
That lasted exactly 20 minutes then he reduced my claim for Constructive Dismissal to Unfair Dismissal hoping that as a litigant in person I wouldn’t know the difference.
I formally complained to Leahy and the Acting Regional Chairman, BRIAN DOYLE remaining ignored until I submitted appeal papers against the document produced by Leahy. I wrote to the then Lord Chancellor, Lord Irving of Lariq and told him what had happened.
Another directions hearing was hurriedly convened for 17 Jan 03.
A Woolley was back as Chairman making it clear that she had a good overview of the complex case and refused to collude with Griffiths who was in full throttle again.
I had taken another two people to witness events.
Ms Woolley said I would have 3 days to read my statement and cross reference facts to related documents throughout. She ordered LCC to release their work diaries to me. LCC were furious.
They refused to comply with the Order and did not release their diaries.
On March 17th 2003 I had 2 with me for the first day of the substantive hearing. LCC had a few in number. The Chairman was a PETER RUSSELL and the lay members Barnes and Nicholls. The clerk was Claire Hobley and she told me that LCC had had Ms Woolley taken from the case.
We were on Floor 7 for a special reason.
Claire told me that LCC had had Ms Woolley removed because she was partial to me. No she wasn’t, she just saw the truth and knew it was me that was telling it.
I was rushed through my statement in less than one day and not allowed to refer to documents at al. RUSSELL sat bored and gazing at the ceiling most of the time.
GRIFFITHS leapt to her feet as soon as she could, her gibberish spilled out.
Their defence was that “You’ve been to Cuba, you’re political!”
My going to New Orleans was made something of as well.
Griffiths kept me on the witness stand for 3 days without asking me one single proper question.
Finally a document was thrust at me, JANE WEBB, Detective Lancashire police, case in point, BM/KM Jane Webb had destroyed 6 pages of evidence in that case of serious sexual abuse of a 12year old girl with learning difficulties and her 13 year old brother. The 6 pages named the perpetrator, it was inconvenient, it showed WEBB with PATRICIA ALLEN Social Services Manager Child Protection to be what they were, inept at best.
That person named in the 6 pages was the person I had named at the time. WEBB was now teaching me the proverbial lesson.
I declared Webb’s letter to be a perjured document under Section 5 of the Perjury Act 1911.
I showed how I could prove the perjury.
RUSSELL became interested all of a sudden asking if there were any other perjured documents in the bundle from LCC. “Yes, every single one”.
“Show us then, show us” screeched the abysmal excuse for a barrister.
She was having hysterics and not very quietly.
The court ended for the day with LCC and Peter Russell meeting privately in his chambers. I thought it was unfair, I didn’t know it was illegal.
March20th day two, TONY BRADSHAW LCC witness, perjurer, proven, by now LCC attending mob-handed, hostile, oppressive atmosphere.
Meetings between bench and LCC regular. Claire Hobley kept me informed.
21st Friday, day 3 PATRICIA ALLEN for LCC couldn’t read her statement, she is only semi-literate, perjury proven and witnessed by one member of the public who’d walked in and was told to leave by Russell.
On Saturday and Sunday I prepared a document to read out on Monday 23rd. I objected to what was being allowed and recorded that there were no signed witness statements from LCC, all had been written by one person, a farce was in progress.
Peter Russell tried, on Monday 23rd to prevent me from reading that one page but I insisted and read it. I had two people to witness events.
Witnesses for LCC that 2nd week: TONY BRADSHAW again, GILLIAN ARMSTRONG, MARIA LEWIS, PAT DAMMS, TONY MORRISEY, VICTOR WELCH, DAVID FAIRCLOUGH, JUDY DEERING, JANE GRAY, JOHN BUTTON, STANLEY ELY, CLIVE GIDDINGS, ELIZABETH MURPHY.
Griffiths read out the unsigned witness statement of LOUISE YOUNG, saying she was ‘on leave’.
Louise didn’t work for LCC and hadn’t done when her statement had been written for her, probably by B Cullen. No witnesses for LCC had ever seen their statements before reading them out. It was expected that I wouldn’t go so far, Griffiths refused to call Sue Mitchell or Bob Gower, Pauline Oliver had resigned to protect her pension.
In my summing up I declared violations of human rights with relevant legislation. P Russell said, “We don’t bother with those”.
JUDY DEERING routine perjurer for LCC as solicitor in child care also worked as a bar night club manager, Temple Night Club in Bolton, in breach of her employment contract, I reported her to the Law Society as I did Cullen and those from the legal department including IAN YOUNG and CLAIRE GREALIS. The corruption of the Law Society in protecting those criminals will be a related entry later. DEERING ‘disappeared’ in the same way that P. Oliver had.
Summing up on 28/3/03 I had 1 witness and was told that I had won and to expect a remedy hearing. I was also asked if I would accept a remedy at the same time instead of having another case of bullying heard against FAIRCLOUGH and YOUNG of LCC. I waited many weeks, nothing arrived.
I went to Bury St Edmunds smelling a rat.
My claim 2406569/01 had never been registered, it had therefore never been legally heard. It had all been a waste of taxpayers’ monies.
On May 7th I received Peter Russell’s Extended Reasons document. I had lost and would pay costs. A cost hearing had been arranged for 28 May 03.
I wrote saying I would charge them with fraud, BRIAN DOYLE told me it was my responsibility to call in the CPS. He also said he’d consider my complaint when the process was complete. He did not.
I wrote to Barnes and Nicholls, Doyle wrote to me saying he had my letters to them and they wouldn’t be allowed to have them. I complained to the Royal Mail for which corruption of 4 years via Freemason JOHN BUTLER in Lancaster then Preston Sorting Offices and his associates within the RM HQ ROSA THORPE and TOBY THOMAS see related entry http://www.royalmailcorruptionwatchuk.blogspot.com/
P Russells’ Extended Reasons document was amateurish and contradictory in the extreme. It was unsealed with no court seal, it was not on headed paper, it was undated, it did not comply with basic rules and procedures and so on. It was expected that I wouldn’t see the junk mail for what it was. Given that he knew I’d be entering it into the EAT at least it was a perjured document under the terms of the 1911 Act Sec 5. There had been no Decision Judgement Document signed by all three members.
I requested a DJD numerous times but remained ignored. One did not exist. Peter Russell also recorded that LCC had not destroyed my GP notes and that my PID was of no interest to the public, neither was the altering of children’s files or the committee meeting minutes.
The hearing for 28/5/03 hurriedly arranged was then hurriedly cancelled “because counsel cannot attend” no other date was set. Fraud frightened them.
I initiated an appeal in the Employment Appeal Tribunals (EAT),link http://www.criticalreader2004.blogspot.com/
At the end of July 2003 I received from LCC their ‘revised closing submissions’. (I know, they inhabit a complete fantasy land), the letter to court from LCC copied to me anonymously was words to the effect “Hurry up, give her a cost hearing before she reports us to the police”.
I had tried to report them to the police in Lancaster (for which corruption see related entry) and the CPS in Preston via a Tracey Ames who was doing her job when IAN RUSHTON pushed her aside to ‘see me off’. http://www.cpscorruptionwatchuk.blogspot.com/
The new cost date was set for 1 Sept 03, for days prior to the EAT hearing making it illegal in any event.
I did not go to MET on 1/9/03 and the costs awarded against me were almost £40k. I was expected to fund what can best described as organised crime.
The court computerised records show that the cost hearing had gone ahead on 28 May 03 in my absence for the purposes of Russell cobbling something together with LCC to be passed off as points of law when they even struggle to spell ‘law’ let alone understand it.
The records of all that are still in my possession.
The records, obtained via the DTI who were then data controllers for the ETS and I’d made my Sec 7 SAR to them.
The records show 1) that P Russell and LCC met privately in April 2003 for 2 days, that would for purposes of compiling his banal junk mail, no court seal, no court crest document, no date Extended Reasons. 2) The case had never been registered and thus never legally heard, 3) no costs had ever been awarded against me either in March 03 or April 03.
FRAUD documented and proven.
The money was for LCC to give to Russell as PAYOLA for ‘throwing’ my case. LEAHY, DOYLE and a PETER BEAUMONT are all part of that established practice/corruption.
Peter Beaumont’s entry to be linked.
President of the ETS, JUDGE MEERAN only answered one of my letters and in that letter he lied to me which was proven. MEERAN clearly sets the standards for the ETS.
FALCONER replaced the Lord Irving of Lariq as Lord Chancellor link http://www.lordchancellorsresignation.blogspot.com/
Chief Executive of the ETS, Roger Heathcote was a decent man and did what he could. His replacement, Jeanne Spinks, the usual token female, is the puppet in the hands of the ‘men’ pulling the strings.
Claire Hobley clerk resigned over this.
ACAS and UNISON will be linked to show the references and the picture will emerge.
The links are as above and link to others within.
N.B. The would-be-thief, liar, bully and perjurer PETER RUSSELL records that my documents were scotch mist. They were and are not. They are still in my possession.
Carol Woods Lancaster.
CAROL WOODS, CASINOS, CORRUPTION & CRIME – LANCASHIRE TIBERIUS
On 15th Dec 2000 when I was employed as a social worker for Lancashire County Council (LCC) I attended a meeting of staff, clients, their families etc, subject: home closures on a site known as Fylde Comunity School near Blackpool, Lancs.
Hilton Dawson, then MP for Lancaster, Fylde and Wyre attended as did the LCC Consultant, Ed Nixon. The staff union involved, UNISON, declined to send a rep.
The meeting was well attended but astonishingly I was the only field social worker in attendance.
Some in LCC planned to seize 134 acres of land, evict families from their homes on that site telling them they had no tenants’ rights, close a working farm, a full time school, dismiss 46 staff members illegally and close 4 homes for disturbed adolescent boys.
I said in that meeting, “You can’t do that” and I was taken to one side and told, “You’re right, keep quiet, or else”.
That was later sent to me via senior managers in a letter.
Hilton Dawson as my MP ignored my pleas for help.
I followed all the proper procedures and policies for complaining within LCC (I had 4 clients on that site who had nowhere else to live if it closed as it was doing, ad hoc and illegally. Then boys were all in care to the Local Authority as were all other boys on site, approx. 100). LCC had no foster carers or field support workers and on 21 April 01 I wrote to the Social Services Committee warning that something would happen if the boys were evicted into the community unmonitored.
LCC whistle blowing contact, Clive Giddings, had told me I would be disciplined and sacked for gross misconduct if I continued to complain about the Fylde closure.
My protected disclosure was not protected.
I finally surrendered my post at the end of Aug 01 after being bullied etc for 8 months by management intent on forcing me out on instruction from HQ Preston. Tony Bradhsaw, Pat Allen and Gillian Armstrong were the worst offenders then acting on instruction from David Fairclough, then Head of Human Resources for LCC.
On 30th June 01 my predictaion as to a serious evenmt happened. 2 of the boys from Fylde discharged into the community where no one knew where they were, had recruited a teenaged gang and murdered a pensioner, Sheila Bridge. (see Internet)
I ha dtaken my complaint to the LGO, York office and was assigned an investigator, Roger Barham. We got on well and sometimes just chatted on the phone. LCC had told him that they would not submit documents if he was to send them to me. R Barham said that the Sec of State would ensure their compliance. I eventually got the documents.
I was to analyse the evidence in the documents and compile a report which I did.
By then I had discovered that Ed Nixon had lied to all staff, clients and their families in the “Consultation”. He had said in a letter to all, “I am Director of Atlantic Children’s Trust. I am independent and impartial”.
E Nixon was a friend of senior manager, Sue Mitchell and Tony Morrissey (both child care) and was unemployed which is why they recruited him.
Also, I checked with Companies House. His company did not exist; he had bought the name from the Exchange and Mart. (False CV at least, criminal offence.)
D Fairclough as Head of Human Resources had compiled the letter with Bob Gower, another senior child care manager in HQ for Ed Nixon to send out. They knew what they were doing. Naturally I have all that in writing as I ahve every last document referred to in this.
I concnetrated my report on points of law, Local Government Law and human rights etc and noted Case Law.
R Barham was encouraging, he rang saying he couldn’t help me write my report but could say whether I was on the right track or not.
I told him what I was concentrating on and he said we’d get LCC for maladministration at least.
I was pleased with my report. It was 12 pages handwritten then, since typed for clarity, and I submitted it early Sept 01 but heard nothing.
At the end on Oct 01 I received a card from R Barham saying that pressure of work prevented him dealing with the case.
On Christmas Eve of 2001 I received a letter from R Barham, no report, and it was nothing like he’d ever written to me previously. It was almost 5 years later that I learned he had not written that letter (report, call it what you will), Ian Young of LCC legal dept had written it for him, Barham had simply signed it.
In May 2002 I discovered that the March 01 Committee Meeting Minutes for LCC had been altered in that month of May 02. They then included the legal recommendations I had said they should have made re Fylde. They were rewritten to allow senior managers to distance themsleves from the corporate manslaughter of Mrs Bridge.
(My letter to Ian Fisher Head of Legal dept LCC saying they should be charged with corporate manslaughter started a whole new aspect to this, anyone can aske what that was.)
In July 2002 I discovered, after a court ordered release of files to me, some children’s files had been altered by P Allen, T Bradshaw and G Armstrong to try and discredit my work as a social worker (child protection.) The altered files were detrimental to the familes and children as well as me.
The LGO investigator, Colin Oxley, chum of R Barham did nothing although I reported the Minutes and the files issues.
The children were all minors and had no one to speak for them.
In 2002 I had learned of Judicial Reviews and applied to the High Court. Judge Hooper gave me permission for an oral hearing which would have been heard July 2002.
He said he couldn’t order the re-opening but he could order a proper investigation into the closures, sackings, evictions etc.
I was actively prevented from attending that oral hearing.
And that’s when the corruption was further compunded and continues to be so today. Feb 5th 2007.
Readers can know what I didn’t know until the end of 2002 and that was , “Who was legal advisor for LCC on those closures leading to corporate manslaughter? Cherie Blair.
In 2003 I also had cogent evidence that Pat Allen for LCC worked with a false CV and swore in Family Courts High Division that she had qualifications that did not exist. Perjury to pervert the course of justice for vulnerable families.
P Allen had been a cleaner in a children’s home and had sexual relations with senior manager, including D Fairclough hence her rapid rise through to management when she could scarcely write her name and address.
The LGO in York ignored all that cogent evidence.
But the Ombudsman at the time until Sept 05) was Pauline Thomas.
I traced Mrs Thomas in June 06 (she retired in Sept 05) and she agreed to see me. (I was suitably vague in my letters).
Mrs Thomas knew nothing about Fylde or the children’s files or the Committee Meeting Minutes.
R Barham had conspired to pervert the course of justice with Fishger and Young at least from LCC. Was he paid to do that? He will not deny it. PAYOLA. Usual for LCC.
The Director of the time, Pauline Oliver was advised to take early retirement in 2002 which she did to protect her pension.
Anne Seex succeeded Mrs Thomas and much is known about Mrs Seex.
But I know something else. Our paths crossed on a personal matter in 1998. She did not win.
Hilton Dawson resigned as MP for Lancaster and Anne Sacks quietly slipped into his place. She lost in the election.
Judy Deering, solicitor for LCC working on the perjury with P Allen was advised to take early retirement in 2003 when it became known that I knew that she was also woprking as a bar manager in a night club in Bolton, (Temple Bar) in breach of her contract for LCC.
P Allen is well protected. She would undoubtedly seek revenge if ‘allowed to go’.
The land was seized illegally, all 134 acres of it. The Freemasons were involved: greed, money, land grabbing, corrupt police and murder. Traits of those in that silly boys’ club.
Every last statement of fact as above can be proven via documentary evidence. It is still safe despite collective attempts to take it from me. All public interest.